Skip to content

Conversation

@shumyla-farid
Copy link

@shumyla-farid shumyla-farid commented Dec 12, 2025

🎯 Changes

βœ… Checklist

  • I have followed the steps in the Contributing guide.
  • I have tested this code locally with pnpm run test:pr.

πŸš€ Release Impact

  • This change affects published code, and I have generated a changeset.
  • This change is docs

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified the caching lifecycle documentation with more explicit terminology to better describe timeout behavior.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 12, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4be3073

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 12, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation clarification update to the caching guide that explicitly mentions gcTime terminology when describing cache timeout behavior during subsequent component mounts. No functional changes; only wording improved for accuracy.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation clarification
docs/framework/react/guides/caching.md
Updated lifecycle description to explicitly reference gcTime terminology instead of generic "cache timeout" when describing timing behavior before subsequent mounts.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A doc once said "timeout" with grace,
But gcTime should take its placeβ€”
A rabbit rewrote with care,
Now clarity floats through the air! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The PR description includes all required template sections but the 'Changes' section lacks detailβ€”it's left as a comment placeholder with no actual description of what was clarified or why. Fill in the '🎯 Changes' section with a brief explanation of what cache time clarifications were made and the motivation for the change.
βœ… Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check βœ… Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: clarifying cache time (gcTime) in the caching guide documentation for useQuery.
Docstring Coverage βœ… Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
πŸ§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f15b7fc and 4be3073.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/framework/react/guides/caching.md (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
docs/framework/react/guides/caching.md (1)

30-30: Clear terminology clarification. βœ“

Adding the explicit (gcTime) clarification improves documentation accuracy and consistency with how gcTime is referenced elsewhere in the guide (lines 17, 29). This helps readers immediately understand that "cache timeout" refers to the configurable gcTime property rather than assuming generic terminology.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant